This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:00 AM

Brian Williams nominates Peggy Noonan for a Pulitzer Prize

The WSJ column hailed by the NBC anchor as "a splendid piece of journalism" has to be read to be believed.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, April 29, 2008 07:04 PM

    @karrsic Re: Propaganda laws

    *** 1 ***

    There's the "Anti-Lobbying Act" (18 U.S. Code Sec. 1913).

    As of yet, in the decades since that law was enacted, no Administration has ever prosecuted itself under the Anti-Lobbying Act.

    But that doesn't mean that law has had no effect -- all federal agencies have guidelines and rules to avoid breaking that law, and those guidelines and rules do have *some* effect.

    *** 2 ***

    Another law is the Smith-Mundt Act (22 USC 1461), which prohibits domestic distribution of U.S. government-produced information and/or propaganda which is targeted at foreigners.

    But does this apply if the Pengagon was targeting only the USA?

    *** 3 ***

    The annual appropriations bills, which authorize funding of U.S. government agencies, generally contain anti-propaganda restrictions. For instance, from a GAO decision in 2004:

    http://gao.gov/decisions/appro/302710.htm

    The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’s (CMS) use of appropriated funds to pay for the production and distribution of story packages that were not attributed to CMS violated the restriction on using appropriated funds for publicity or propaganda purposes in the Consolidated Appropriations Resolution of 2003, Pub. L. No. 108-7, Div. J, Tit. VI, § 626, 117 Stat. 11, 470 (2003).
    http://gao.gov/decisions/appro/302710.htm

    So, if a retired general is a "message multiplier" then might he also be, for legal purposes, an "unattributed story package"?

    *** 4 ***

    And there's the issue of whether any contracts were awarded - - or denied - - based not on proper contracting criteris but instead based on good performances or bad performances by the "military analysts".

    Remember, according the NYTimes story, the "analysts" were getting briefed not only by intelligence specialists and public information specialists, but also by contracting specialists, and it's hard to imagine a legitimate reason for that.

    *** 5 ***

    And I'm sure there are other legal issues.

Most Active Letters Threads

561

Everybody hates mommy

We're "stroller Nazis." We're whiny "breeders." Why is there so much contempt for mothers these days?
329

The extreme secrecy of the federal courts

Judges are not only permitted, but required, to conceal anything the government declares to be secret.
304

Greg Craig and Obama's worsening civil liberties record

A new Time account of the fall of Obama's White House counsel sheds much light on rule of law issues.
213

Praying for Obama's death

Pastors are invoking Psalm 109 -- "May his days be few" -- in hopes of saving our country, and our souls
162

Explaining ClimateGate: A history of distrust

Asking researchers to delete e-mails after receiving an FOI request is never a good idea. So why did it happen?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon