Letters to the Editor
-
Skewed Shooter Logic
Shooter, as per usual, doing his "yeah, Bush is bad, but Clinton was much worse" deflection shee-it points out in his talking-point-download-cut-and-paste scree: "How about some analysis on the polygamy story instead? Their religious freedoms are being stomped on by the state. If they were Muslim, the situation would be the same but I'm sure the state would leave them alone."
Two points here: firstly, while polygamy is frowned upon in polite society, the deal here is not multiple wives: it's about children. These freeks bring their hare-brained, home-schooled, living-in-a-bubble incestuously in-bred kids up, then marry these children off to scary skinny burning-eyed zealous elderly guys. That, shooter, is the point. It's called child abuse. The crime that a lot of pasty fat stogie-sucking bent old farts (why does Rush Limbaugh come to mind) should swing for.
Secondly, stop playing the frigging 'Oh-but-the-muslims-are-much-worser-guys' card. It(s despicable, and s-o-o-o-o totally not mature.
Then, shooter continues in his mewling: "Perhaps the sect should start bombing people to gain their freedom. That strategy seems to work well in Europe. In the UK, not only is Muslim polygamy acceptable, one gets additional benefits for each wife. State benefits that is."
Not true, shooter. You lie, as usual. Polygamy is NOT acceptable in the UK. Please, some references -- not from your downloaded wingnut talking points / golf hints / voucher & coupon savings broadsheet. Liars are bad. Bald-faced liars are despicable.