Here's how WaPo's thoroughly impartial media watchdog Howie Kurtz (you know, the one who's literally in bed with GOP media strategist Sheri Annis) noted this insignificant little incident in his column last Thursday:
Speaking of McCain, A.J. Rossmiller at Americablog jumps on his gaffe of saying Iran was training al-Qaeda operatives, which the senator corrected a moment later: ....A blunder, to be sure, but can the Democratic candidates really argue that they know more about foreign policy?
See, not only was it a tiny little one-time slip-up, he corrected himself (unassisted) a moment later! And we'll stick to that story no matter how many times and how many ways it happens!
"Can the Democratic candidates really argue that they know more about foreign policy?" Not when the fix is in and the media will cover for the Republican candidate's mistakes, no. Under those circumstances, can the Democratic candidates really argue that the sky is blue or Tuesday follows Monday?
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The Maine fight was supposed to be the dress rehearsal for repealing California's Prop. 8 -- but gay marriage lost
Once one obtains Seriousness credentials in the Washington media, they are irrevocable no matter one's conduct.
Salon headlines in your mailbox