Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
The political and media establishment insist on a two-sided, restrained critique without regard to accuracy or reality.
  • One thought

    Glenn, you make a very good point that there's a difference between calling someone a liar when he IS than when he isn't. That being said, there's a difference between calling someone a "no-good, low-down dirty stinking liar" and calling him a liar. One is a statement of fact, the other is an angry rant.

    Also, honest feedback, this post comes across as "Publisher's Weekly was unfair to me, waaaah!" It would have been much stronger if you'd left out your review, and talked about the reviews of others, where you have a very fair point.