Letters to the Editor
This letter is associated with the following article:
-
CLUINTON is the One Who is All Talk
The whole campaign is based on alledged competence-- well, where's the beef?
If Clinton is so much more "organized" why is her campaign organization losing?
If Clinton is "ready to lead from day one", why can't she seem to lead a campaign (one that should have been a shoe-in) to save her life?
If she is so "tested" why is it that as soon as she goes negative, even Democrats immediately remember the hell their party had to go through in the 90s?
In short, if she is so darn effective, why has she been so utterly, blindingly ineffective?
Maybe one of these candidates is actually running on smoke and mirrors-- and it isn't the one you think.