This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, February 15, 2008 12:00 AM

Jihadis throw a wild bash over the Protect America Act

As GOP fear-mongering sinks to new lows, is the House Democrats' defiance yesterday a one-time event or a sign of things to come?

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, February 15, 2008 11:11 PM

    @Clint Brooks

    Especially telling about Greenwald's post is how his last paragraph makes the bizarre claim that the telcos would cooperate where necessary because they are legally required "to cooperate with legal surveillance."

    The "legal requests" that Glenn is referring to need to be submitted to the FISA court. This is spelled out clearly in the FISA law (and updated by the Protect America Act). As long as the conditions, defined by law, are followed, the telcos are required to cooperate.

    So what's so "bizarre" about Glenn's claim?

    That you would write this indicates that you aren't too familiar with the specifics of the warrantless wiretapping issue.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
412

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
60

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon