This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, December 31, 2007 12:00 AM

Michael Bloomberg: Trans-partisan savior

Who thinks a third party candidate like this is a good idea, and why?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, December 31, 2007 02:13 PM

    ondelette

    Who will dump the religious nuts and violent extremists that were useful for coming to power but are increasingly a hard to control liability first?

    I can't see Musharraf doing it because his religious nuts and violent extremists are his source for the massive funding the US sends his way. If he truly does something about them, his golden goose is gone.

    Over here, I think it's more of a trick question. If Huckleberry shows more signs of success, some of the violent extremists will break with some of the religious nuts. They'll both claim the party, but the rest of us will party as we watch them totally self-destruct.

    Pass the popcorn.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
417

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon