This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, December 31, 2007 12:00 AM

Michael Bloomberg: Trans-partisan savior

Who thinks a third party candidate like this is a good idea, and why?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, December 31, 2007 08:03 AM

    Unity Indeed

    .....the Republicans decided that Reagan gad won the White House for the Republicans for all time and no Democrat could possibly legitimately occupy that residence, and therefore a constitutional coup was called for.

    rCnato

    That's about the size of it, isn't it? The plutocrats and the military-industrial complex had hit on the perfect Manchurian candidate in Reagan, and set about immediately building a cult around him, so they would never again have to honestly try to sell their self-serving policies.

    The Hollywood-trained GE pitchman for unfettered capitalism, selling a muscular, winner-take-all America to the plebes, who simply aren't smart enough to vot the Right Way, and must therefore be scammed and spun relentlessly.

    Lowering taxes raises revenue, you've seen one tree, you've seen them all, and welfare queens all drive Cadillacs. More is more, bigger is better, and, as Fawn Hall memorably said, "sometimes you have to go above the law."

    Down is up on Uranus. No wonder they're so nostalgic.

    I think that the last little detail, the possibilty of impeachment, was still smarting, however, hence the little piece of theatre-verite with Clinton.

    If they could de-legitimize that annoying constitutional check, they'd be off to the races, and could safely hand the car keys to a drunken teenager like Dubya. Oops.

    Now they've got their Imperial Presidency, but are embarassing short of a possible Emperor.

    It would be funny, if it weren't us.

Most Active Letters Threads

739

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
360

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
248

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon