This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, December 31, 2007 12:00 AM

Michael Bloomberg: Trans-partisan savior

Who thinks a third party candidate like this is a good idea, and why?
Glenn Greenwald

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, December 31, 2007 11:51 AM

    Beth

    Yes, I'm serious. This isn't about Hagel. It's about Bloomberg. Besides, I have yet to see it defined and written in blood that Bloomberg really would use or choose Hagel for a running mate.

    The guy is pretending to be putting forth a bipartisan candidacy after all. Which is bullshit from the outset. So why wouldn't his speaking of Hagel as a consideration for a running mate be bullshit from the outset also? That's how I read it. I'm "serious".

    —Kitt Read Kitt's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
423

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
Glenn Greenwald Read article
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
By David Sirota Read article
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation
By DOUG FERGUSON, Associated Press Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon