This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, December 31, 2007 12:00 AM

Michael Bloomberg: Trans-partisan savior

Who thinks a third party candidate like this is a good idea, and why?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, December 31, 2007 06:42 AM

    Billionaires for Bush

    The cynicism and contempt for democracy of this "unity" crowd is quite stunning when you think about it. Unable to field a suitably corporatist crowd, yet unwilling to do the hard work to actually earn the nomination in the normal way, they seek to bypass the whole tedious process by choosing a rich figurehead halfway through the game.

    They've already convinced Shooter, which gives me hope that their little exercise will be laughed off the stage. They'd do well to remember some of Bloomberg's rather insensitive and sexist comments toward a pregnant employee, "Get rid of it," as I recall.

    That'll go over as big in the Bible belt as his enormous wealth.

    And is he manly and Aqua-Velva-y for Chris Matthews' admittedly uh, eclectic tastes? I think not.

    Go ahead and run, Bloomberg. Make my day.

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
581

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
310

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon