This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, December 31, 2007 12:00 AM

Michael Bloomberg: Trans-partisan savior

Who thinks a third party candidate like this is a good idea, and why?

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, December 31, 2007 11:43 AM

    so, glenn..

    if there's time, an interesting subject for a follow-up column might be: who gets hurt more if Bloomberg runs? I've already seen opinion on both sides. That the Democratic party nominee would lose if Bloomberg ran, and that his candidacy is, to some degree, a tactic of the GOP to squeek out a victory the way the Dems did when Perot ran.

    Or, that Bloomberg will steal more votes from the GOP candidate.

    So, what do you think? Who has more trouble with a Bloomberg candidacy? Strikes me the Dems would have more to worry about, even though Bloomberg is far more GOP than dem... if Dems actually voted for the guy it would simply prove, yet again, how pathetically ignorance our voting public is..

Most Active Letters Threads

492

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
119

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
114

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon