This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, December 31, 2007 12:00 AM

Michael Bloomberg: Trans-partisan savior

Who thinks a third party candidate like this is a good idea, and why?

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, January 1, 2008 05:21 AM

    Andrew Sullivan, liar of the worst sort

    Here is the unedited Youtube of Ron Paul's remarks on evolution:

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=zz94-OrnXzE

    Here is the highly-edited version that is referenced by Andrew Sullivan's blog:

    http://reason.tv/roughcut/show/215.html

    Here is a transcript, with the deleted words bracketed and in bold:

    'Well, at first I thought it was a very inappropriate question, you know, for the presidency to be decided on a scientific matter, and I think it's a theory, a theory of evolution, and I don't accept it, you know, as a theory, but I think [it probably doesn't bother me. It's not the most important issue for me to make the difference in my life to understand the exact origin. I think] the Creator that I know created us, everyone of us, and created the universe, and the precise time and manner, I just don't think we're at the point where anybody has absolute proof on either side. [So I just don't...if that were the only issue, quite frankly, I would think it's an interesting discussion, I think it's a theological discussion, and I think it's fine, and we can have our...if that were the issue of the day, I wouldn't be running for public office.']

    About half of Paul's words were censored. Sullivan turned his message of, 'We're fighting for freedom and can't afford to be split over a debate about fossils' into something else entirely. Did Glenn not do a post on this sort of thing not long ago? Ah, I remember now; he did and a few regulars highlighted Glenn's post by savaging Paul in the way GG was writing about. I wonder if they will start loving Andrew Sullivan now.

Most Active Letters Threads

682

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
341

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
276

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon