This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:00 AM

Harry Reid's pro-life stance vs. Ron Paul's

Can one be pro-choice and yet lend support to a politician who isn't?
Glenn Greenwald

Read other letters about this article

  • Thursday, December 20, 2007 04:01 PM

    I despise both Ron Paul and Harry Reid

    As a woman, reproductive rights are extremeley important to me. If you could get pregnant, Glenn, they would be to you too -- much more than they appear to be based on this and other distressingly pro-Ron Paul columns of yours that I've read. Since you can't get pregnant, and will thus never have to face the consequences of an unwanted pregnancy, you have the luxury of considering the subject of reproductive rights a purely academic one. Sure must be nice!

    —katandmoon Read katandmoon's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
369

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article
318

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
Glenn Greenwald Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon