Letters to the Editor
-
Kitt
Nothing in my post indicates that I don't see history, recent or ancient, as relevant. kitt
Except when you say this, I suppose:
Might that be more effective, or at least potentially so, than dragging in every past, present and potential future failure of government and government agents - kitt
The Democratic Party can challenge Bush. Why in the world are they in no position to challenge Bush? That makes no sense. - kitt
It would if you looked at actual results instead of walling yourself in party loyalty.
There will be no moving forward unless it is understood that the Democratic Party is in no position to challenge Bush? How will that 'internalization' moves things forward? kitt
Just about every post on this and other threads explains why: the Democratic Party, as it stands now and has for a long time, is part of the problem, not the solution. It first needs to reform itself before it can effectively lead this country out of its dire situation. That's my view, if you don't mind.

