Letters to the Editor
-
Maybe he was thinking of the Royal Family's marital track record.
As I recall, marriage was "under attack" from none other than Elizabeth herself, early on in her reign, when she prevented her own sister from marrying the man she loved because he was divorced, and the Church of England didn't recognize divorce. Talk about what goes around coming around; not only did she live to see three of her own children get divorced, but she finally had to hold her nose and consent while the heir to the crown married a divorced slut, after committing adultery with her for years. The most exquisite irony is that the one Windsor who may actually manage to stay "married" is her gay son Edward, whose marriage is about as authentic as the power of the monarchy.

