Letters to the Editor
-
fish chouder202. - guppielipbushsmoocher202 - hey, heh. tsk.
call, 202 - 452 - 7468.
a bushy tail weasel,
wants to speak to you.
-
@sh**ter
Oh and that you hate Bush.
Is there anything past that hatred? Apparently not for Glenn at least. It's BDS 24/7/365. I'm going to be interested to see what happens here after Bush leaves office and all the air gets let out of the ballon..
-- shooter242
Glenn's first blog post this morning is about the Democratic Senator, Rockefeller.
For the past few days posts have been about a military flak called Boylan.
There have been numerous posts about media personalities and newsgroups.
Those are just a few examples of hundreds that aren't about Bush.
When Bush is no longer in office there will be posts about other Democratic Senators and Congress persons, just as there will be about Republican Senators and congresspersons, news media people and organizations...the list will go on. Just as it has since the beginning of this blog.
Sh**ter has once again posted a comment that is nothing more than bull and nonsense.
-
labeling
Greenhead says "Whoever is next on the War List is always The New Hitler and the country they lead is always The New Nazi Germany. Anyone who wants the new war is the brave and glorious Churchill. Everyone who opposes the new war is the cowardly appeaser Chamberlain, willing to allow Hitler to Take Over the World and impose Caliphate and burquas and humiliation on everyone."
Let's look at this from another perspective:
Whoever is next on the anti-"Liberal" List is always The New Hitler, or a racist, extremist, right-winger, fascist, and the group they represent is always The New Klan. Anyone who wants to live in peace and Liberty in this country is the next brownshirts. Everyone who opposes "Liberal"(communist, progressive, socialist) policy, laws, regulations, taxes, is a McCarthyite, willing to allow Corpporations to Take Over the World and impose Captialism and slave wages and poverty on everyone."
Gee, I guess labeling is only wrong if you're not a "Liberal" freak. The American Communist Insurgency which transformed itself into modern “Liberal”ism should know because it invented labeling. Read Hitler’s Mein Kempf. In his chapter on propaganda he tells how he learned propaganda from the communists, the forefathers of today’s “Liberals.”
I will never forget how I was labeled by the “Liberal” freaks just because I stood up for my Liberty and my most basic right, that of self defense. Never forget.
This is just another "Liberal" rag. I don't know why so many don't see that. And I didn't vote for Dubya.
RonPaul2008.com
If not Ron Paul, "Liberal" season is in our future. I'm actually looking forward to it.
-
@ waypasthadenough
Guys like you always imagine themselves behind the sights, never in front of them. Why is that?
-
re: Kitt
When Bush is no longer in office there will be posts about other Democratic Senators and Congress persons, just as there will be about Republican Senators and congresspersons, news media people and organizations...the list will go on. Just as it has since the beginning of this blog.
Sh**ter has once again posted a comment that is nothing more than bull and nonsense.
Thanks Kitt! I was getting ready to post on his nonsense but you covered it oh so well, as typically done by the regulars here.
Shooter's diatribe is a perfect example of why trolls should be ignored. While he does at times give off the vibe that he is attempting to actually discuss the issue at hand, a post like this only brings to the forefront his complete and utter lack of honesty and integrity. Yet he claims to bring honesty himself to the table.
If a newbie posted this trash that Glenn focuses only on Bush and that somehow after he leaves office what will Glenn write about? Well, he/she might be excused due to not having read this blog for very long. But for someone like Shooter who's haunted Glenn's blog for years, it's a flat out lie. And he has to know it, but of course being consistent isn't a strong suit of his.
In the end, Shooter is either being the seemingly total liar that he claims to abhor in others, or is plain stupid and doesn't know how-to read.
Either way, what a sorry excuse for a so-called rational person.
-
Why did PBS give Podhoretz airtime?
Is it just me, or does it not seem odd that PBS would give Podhoretz airtime and treat him as if he were just another "intellectual," let alone "expert," on Iran. Check out who is the head of PBS and the politics of that person and you'll recognize why you had to witness Norman Podhoretz being handled with white gloves on PBS.
The Podhoretz appearance recalls Glenn's argument that the US media have failed to perform their role in a democracy since 9/11. You have to include PBS in that assessment, particularly since the right-wing has been concerned for a while now about public television and have managed to get one of their own appointed as director of PBS.
-
@Ché Pasa
No, No, No! You must go to the dickshunary definition of progressivismum! Any dictionary definition will do. These are short, general definitons that any short attention span conservative can read. If there are big words in the definition that he doesn't understand, he can look them up! It's a dickshunary, after all.
"the principles, beliefs, or practices of progressives"
Hold on. I gotta look up "principles". I think that's like the big boss at skool, higher than the teacher. It's that damn progressive edumakashun!
-
Re: labeling
I propose we remove all the labels from the cans in the supermarket. I further propose we put Ron Paul in all the cans. Then we can all prank call the the supermarkets and ask if they have Ron Paul in the can. When the guy sez, "Yeah! We got Ron Paul in the can." We can say, "Well, you better let him out!"
-
Who did ya vote for?
This is just another "Liberal" rag. I don't know why so many don't see that. And I didn't vote for Dubya.
Badnarik or Peroutka? Didya write in David Duke?