This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, October 9, 2007 12:00 AM

What FISA capitulations are Democrats planning next?

The imminent FISA debate implicates every critical issue of constitutional protections, checks and balances and the rule of law.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, October 9, 2007 12:25 PM

    @ Glenn

    It is important here to recall that there is actually an amendment to FISA that is at least arguably justifiable. Even the original FISA law never required warrants in order to eavesdrop on (a) foreign-to-foreign calls or (b) calls involving a U.S. citizen where the target was a non-citizen outside the U.S. (who just happened to call into the U.S.). But recently, technological developments resulted in such calls, even foreign-foreign calls, being routed through the U.S. via fiber optics, and a FISA court ruled this year that the language of FISA requires warrants for such calls.

    It is true that under 50 USC ยง 1801(f)(1), no warrants were required for snooping on calls as long as the "target" is not a "U.S. person". The parallel provision 50 USC 1801(f)(2) requires a warrant for calls to or from the U.S. if the intercept is physically done domestically.

    I thought at one time that the easy "fix" is to remove the geographical intercept locus provision, so that you can't be snooped w/o warrant (on you) unless you're the "target" (and a "U.S. person"). But thinking about it, I realise that there is no real impediment to intelligence procedures as is. Under Title III, there is no need for a warrant on you to tap your calls ... provided that the "target" is not you and that they have a warrant for the "target"! I think the same should apply to any snooping of the calls of people in the U.S.: Fine to snoop on call to you w/o a warrant on you ... as long as someone's shown to the judge that the "target" is someone for whom there is "probable cause" to snoop. Som even though the old FISA places such calls to or from persons in the United States under its aegis, NP! Just get the warrant (or FISA court order) for your foreign "target" and they can snoop all the calls, whether to the U.S. or not. To simply remove the 50 USC 1801(f)(2) clause would allow essentially unlimited snoops on any international calls of people within the United States under any circumstances, because all "targets" outside the U.S. are permissible subjects for wiretaps w/o even a minimal amount of "cause" shown.

    Cheers,

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
416

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
61

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon