. . . according to David Broder in his Washington Post online chat last Friday.
"I think the MoveOn ad on Gen. Petraeus was disgraceful, and it probably did serious damage to the effort to shorten the Iraq war."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2007/09/12/DI2007091202014.html
If he really believes this he should be outraged that our Legislators would let their perceptions of the war be influenced by an ad -- any ad. He should be apoplectic.
But he's smart enough to know that the Republican outrage is just a tactic to change the subject, and he's willing to help them out any way he can. He always has a few spare column inches to help the Republicans feign outrage at something.
And at the end of the online discussion he writes "I want to thank all of you for a stimulating hour. Now I have to go back to work." He so graciously indulged the hoi-polloi for an hour and now he has to go back to work.
Go read the whole thing. It's Broderiffic!
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The Maine fight was supposed to be the dress rehearsal for repealing California's Prop. 8 -- but gay marriage lost
Once one obtains Seriousness credentials in the Washington media, they are irrevocable no matter one's conduct.
Salon headlines in your mailbox