Letters to the Editor

Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
Seeking a concise and creative title to describe the faux masculinity warriors on the right.
The letters thread is now closed.
  • Book cover and title:

    A split cover--on the left, a collage of Republicans. On the right, a large photo of the governator from "Conan the Barbarian."

    The title:

    "Truth is Stranger than Fiction."

    Or simply:

    "Truth and Fiction."

    Or,

    "Separated at Birth? Not!"

  • I Offer Up A Title

    The Emperor's New Penis

    (I might use a different word, one that replaces "clothes" a little better, but I doubt you would want that in your book title.)

  • Hankest

    Little Dicks.

    Perfect!

  • @ samson141

    No, if I am able to recognize these failings in myself, I can also recognize them in others. Is a Doctor who smokes or is overweight unqualified to tell you that you shouldn't smoke or that you need to lose weight?

    No, but a doctor who smokes and is overweight would have no business mocking a patient who was.

    They real questsion (and I think it is the one Glenn is asking) is: Where do these people get off calling ours wimps when (1) ours are not and (2) their's are phony cowboys?

    Yes, that's probably more accurate.

  • The Codpiece Conservatives

    (How America Was Left Wanting More)

  • TD Allen

    But when you go so far as to post a photograph of them as prime evidence that they are in fact unmasculine (as you did of Mark Hemingway), you are seriously over the border into the same territory right-wing commentators have staked out for their own--and they're welcome to it. Point out the hypocrisy of their words, but hinge their hypocrisy on the way they look?

    When I first read the column, I agreed with you. But I also initially agreed with Kerry's refusal to "stoop to their level" and swing back at the Swift Boaters. Certainly, I figured, people will be able to see right through their attack and Kerry will come out looking like the adult. We all know how well that panned out.

    It's time someone other than comedians (Franken, Maher, Stewart & Colbert) start swinging back.

  • book title

    FauxHawks: Right-wing males and their curious machismo.

    There are a lot of good subtitles suggested that would go well with this main title. I would steal those.

  • Lowenbrau

    Totally harsh, bordering on trolling and I am loving every minute of it.

    Enjoy Mark in a press photo from his stint in the band "Cartel"

    http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/8075/1150/1600/Cartel2.jpg

    He pictured in the back-left (who am kidding, you can't miss him)

    You cannot make this shit up. My sides hurt...

  • C'mon, spell it out

    I don't use a person's physical appearance to demean them or refute their arguments. I didn't even want to post pictures of people ever out of concern that it would seem to be doing that. But this is plainly NOT doing that. This is examining their relevant attribtues to see if they embody the virtues they accuse others of lacking.

    What are the relevant attributes you see in the picture? What virtues are embodied in this guy's image? I thought you had an argument to make, but apparently you're ashamed to post it in public.

    I hope you never try this unworthy stunt again.

  • I should have known...

    that after 91 comments someone would have already hit on "codpiece conservatives".

  • Frog Prince Warriors of the Right

    Toads who look in a glassy lake and see Lancelot staring back.

    Mirror mirror on the right, who's the manliest in sight?

  • Mark Hemingway - coming soon in a men's room near you

    I'm sure he, like most pundits, has never engaged in any behavior that will come back to haunt him.

  • Sex, Hats, Beer, and Cattle

    Sex, Hats, Beer, and Cattle - Republican Myths and Democratic Realities

    Maybe leave out the beer - it was the common touch that helped elect Bush - and may or may not be useful in this election.

    O/T One wonders how sexual mirroring plays out with a woman on the scene. If I were HRC, I'd be going, not for a post modern Margaret Thatcher image, but maybe for a female Solomon image (obviously I do not win public offices, so pay no attention).

    Waay off topic, but the politics of not only sex but race(ism) will be in play in the next 15 months. It will be interesting to see how Republicans deal with the stereotype of the the black (inherently sexy) tough guy and see them try to flip the image on Obama. In my opinion the John Edwards hair stuff was just a warm up for their real mud.

  • A GOP

    How does "A Gathering Of Pecksniffs," as a title work for you?

    Pecksniff is the unctuous hypocrite of Charles Dicken's Martin Chuzzlewit.

    My dictionary defines Pecksniffian as hypocritical; insincere; falsely moralistic.

    Unctuous is defined as oily in speech or manner. The GOP is oily in more than one sense of the word.

    And lastly, a Gathering of Pecksniffs can be referred to in short as the GOP.

  • How 'bout the neocon war cry......

    Let's you and him fight

  • Phony Tough

    plus subtitle of your choice. "Behind the Stall" maybe, if the book were to focus on the homosexual-denial/hypocrisy angle.

    But so far I like the "Stuffed Package/Stuffing the Package" idea; it's catchy, you know what it means, it references an (in)famous image, and it's appropriately derisive.

  • Re: Cartel

    If I were Paul Giamatti's Mom, I'd sue.

  • Titles (not looking at anyone else's before posting)

    Stuff in parentheses is not part of any suggested title.

    Frightening Neoconservatives (it is easy to do, and they are)

    (Other Main Titles and Subtitles - Mix and match to suit)

    The John Wayne Problem: Image vs. Reality in Politics

    The Duke of Girl: Gender Spin in the Media

    Real Men and Quiche: The Dizzying Spin of Gender Politics

    Strong and Weak: Evidence vs. Image in Politics

    Mars vs. Venus: The False News Destroying America

    A Study in Self-Caricature: The Myth of Manliness

    Caesar and Brutus: The Real Man Revealed

    Strong Image, Weak Mind: The Media Illusionists

    The Emasculators: The Weak in Power

    Urban Myths and Popular Legends: The Neoconservative Warriors’ Broken Code

    (Other possibilities: )

    The Strong Liberal Revealed

    When Macho Is Not Strong

    The Strongest Lie

    Media Circus Strongmen

    Biography of a Lie: Neoconservative Courage

    Projection of the Weak

    Warriors and Tough Guys: Gender Legends

    The Anatomy of Hypocrisy: Weak Chins and Amputated Courage

    The Warriors You Don't Know

  • More playing with packages

    The Right-Wing Package: Manufacturing the Warrior Myth

    The Strong Leader’s Package: The Infinite Gap between Myth and Reality

    The Faux Package: Masculinity, Myth, and Reality in Right-Wing Discourse