Letters to the Editor
-
@nabalzbbfr
It is Glenn's position that is extremist and anti-American. The US has claimed the right to unilaterally intervene since at least the proclamation of the Monroe Doctrine and actively exercised this right. It is a no-brainer that there is moral justification for assisting in the overthrow of heinous regimes in Iran and North Korea. The only serious question is what are the likely prospects for a successful outcome. No sane person would now argue against the successful American interventions in Granada, Panama, Haiti, Bosnia or Kosovo.
It is a matter of the historical record that Islam has been on America's shit list for several centuries, even before the Monroe Doctrine was expressed.
It is a well-documented fact, but one much overlooked in our Marxist academies, that the city of Granada fell to the Castilians in 1492 as a result of one of the CIA's earliest foreign interventions, thus liberating it from dark and despotic Muslim rule.
So there you have it. The Founding Father hated Islam. Islamic governments can therefore be overthrown with impunity. It's literally anti-American to think otherwise.