Read other letters about this article
I believe that's what Hunter was referring to. I don't fully understand the foreign-to-foreign-through-the-US issue, either, but anyway, this is from Glenn's second update (interview w/ Sen. Dodd):
GG: There is this gap in FISA, which everyone, even Russ Feingold, says needs to be filled, which is that if there is a foreign-to-foreign conversation which happens to be routed through the U.S., it requires a warrant -- so why not just say "OK, we fixed this gap and here's our bill and if you veto it, and there's a terrorist attack, then it's your responsibility"?
CD: Hello? Sounds pretty reasonable to me. ...