This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, July 30, 2007 12:00 AM

The really smart, serious, credible Iraq experts O'Hanlon and Pollack

Like most liberal "war hawks," the Brookings "scholars" falsely pretend that they were critics of the Iraq strategy to save their own reputations.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, July 30, 2007 04:55 PM

    My test for pure idiocy is missle defense

    I followed the links to Brookings to see if O'Hanlon was as bad as you make him seem. The first hit was some truly dimwitted congressional testimony. The second was even worse : He put his name on a book advocating a limited missile shield.

    While advocating war in Iraq & then pretending not to have should disqualify you from ever talking about war and peace again, pushing that insane boondoogle should result in 10 years in a clown nose & "Kick Me" sign.

Most Active Letters Threads

370

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
205

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
104

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
86

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
51

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon