Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
What Beltway media stars mean by "centrism" and "extremism" Conventional wisdom immediately solidified that Clinton's diplomacy response was more popular and mainstream than Obama's, even though polling data shows the exact opposite.
  • "Willing to meet" versus "Promising to meet"

    http://cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/23/debate.transcript

    CNN / YouTube
    Democratic presidential debate transcript

    COOPER: Let's go to another YouTube video.

    QUESTION: In 1982, Anwar Sadat traveled to Israel, a trip that resulted in a peace agreement that has lasted ever since. In the spirit of that type of bold leadership, would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?

    OBAMA: I would. [ . . . ] (APPLAUSE) [ . . . ]

    CLINTON: Well, I will not promise to meet with the leaders of these countries during my first year.

    - - CNN/YouTube Democratic presidential debate transcript

    Obama didn't "promise" to meet those leaders. He didn't promise to fly to their countries.

    Clinton didn't say she wasn't "willing" to meet those leaders. She said that she would want proper diplomatic groundwork before such a meeting, but she didn't say that she would demand preconditions from those leaders before meeting with them.

    They chose to present their position in different ways, and they chose to criticize each other's presentation, but there was no fundamental disagreement.

Most Active Stories

Read More

Letters Help

Daily Delivery

Salon headlines in your mailbox