This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, July 24, 2007 12:00 AM

John Yoo -- then and now

The authoritarian lawyer will say anything in service of defense of George W. Bush's power.

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, July 24, 2007 10:28 AM

    I've noticed...

    that the Bush Apologists (as Yoo did yesterday) tend go back into history to defend him and ignore more recent developments. For example, according to a recently updated CRS report, "Presidential Claims of Executive Privilege: History, Law, Practice and Recent Developments,"

    As indicated in the above discussion, recent appellate court rulings cast considerable doubt on the broad claims of privilege posited by OLC in the past and now by the Clement Memo. Taken together, Espy [1997] and Judicial Watch [2004] arguably have effected important qualifications and restraints on the nature, scope and reach of the presidential communications privilege.

    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/secrecy/RL30319.pdf

    Why didn't Yoo discuss these recent cases in his op-ed? I'd really like to hear what he has to say about them. I imagine I'll have to wait until the next Democratic president invokes executive privilege.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
412

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon