This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:00 AM

The NYT on the administration's "debate" over whether to attack Iran

A front-page article examining the possibility of a new war includes some questionable facts and excludes some relevant ones.
Glenn Greenwald

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, June 16, 2007 11:06 AM

    oh and by the way...

    time to cancel your subscription to the times....

    I am sure Glenn will be happy to keep us up to date...

    —xophere Read xophere's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

735

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article
325

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
192

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself
Joan Walsh Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon