This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:00 AM

The NYT on the administration's "debate" over whether to attack Iran

A front-page article examining the possibility of a new war includes some questionable facts and excludes some relevant ones.
Glenn Greenwald

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, June 16, 2007 02:56 PM

    How much is war worth to the MSM?

    Anybody every seen an analysis of the ratings increase for network/cable news during the war? Curious if they really are on the side of the bullet makers...

    Can't get much traction on Darfur? DOJ? Paris? WAR!

    Just a curiosity... I am sure there is an excitement around war. That they clearly enjoyed during the last round. Maybe it's not financial but a desire to be at the center of attention again...

    —xophere Read xophere's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
273

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
Glenn Greenwald Read article
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
By David Sirota Read article
57

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation
By DOUG FERGUSON, Associated Press Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon