This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:00 AM

The NYT on the administration's "debate" over whether to attack Iran

A front-page article examining the possibility of a new war includes some questionable facts and excludes some relevant ones.

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, June 16, 2007 11:05 AM

    Where are the Dem candidates on Iran?

    Especially the two most likely nominees: Hillary and Obama?

    Are they for war with Iran, or do they fear being attacked for their views? We should be hearing more from the Dem leadership in Congress, too.

    Also, if enough Americans favor more wars against people not like them, or just don't give a damn about anything but themselves, little will be done to stop this madness by those mentioned above. The only hope then to prevent war would be true heroic action from people in positions of power.

    America is not Germany in the 1930's, at least not yet.

Most Active Letters Threads

426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
368

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
59

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon