This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:00 AM

The NYT on the administration's "debate" over whether to attack Iran

A front-page article examining the possibility of a new war includes some questionable facts and excludes some relevant ones.
Glenn Greenwald

Read other letters about this article

  • Saturday, June 16, 2007 10:51 AM

    NYT customers...

    It is clear who the times is loyal too... The wealthy elite class. PR is not a conservative tool. It is a tool of control. I recommend you listen to Noam Chomsky's "Propaganda and Control Of The Public Mind".

    The times is just playing to it's audience and playing up to it's sources.

    It isn't conspiracy it is simply corporate marketing implemented for government control.

    It is interesting to wonder where it all leads...

    —xophere Read xophere's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
618

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
Glenn Greenwald Read article
318

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article
209

Bigotry wins in Switzerland

By voting to ban the construction of minarets, Switzerland apes the most extreme intolerance in the Muslim world
By Juan Cole Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon