This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:00 AM

Gonzales' yearlong effort to block Comey's testimony

Read other letters about this article

  • Tuesday, May 15, 2007 11:37 PM

    Another tiny quibble

    Technically, that sentence is true, but what actually happened, as confirmed today, is that the White House kept going anyway, even without permission from the OLC. The White House continued the "T.S.P." -- without making any concessions to "tougher legal standards" -- even after the USDOJ and OLC had told the White House that the "T.S.P." was illegal.
    — sysprog

    Actually, they didn't tell them that it was illegal; what they told them was that they couldn't certify that it was legal. This is a fine distinction that Comey stuck to when Arlen Specter tried to coax out of him an opinion that he considered the program illegal. Comey clearly has a sharp legal mind and I'm sure the distinction exists there between not being able to to certify the program as legal and declaring it illegal. From what Comey implied (but left unstated), any basis for legality was so iffy that it was inadequate as a basis for certification.

Most Active Letters Threads

348

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
323

Tough-guy John Bolton, hiding under his bed

As usual, right-wing pseudo-warriors are drowning in extreme cowardice.
163

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
154

Phil Carter's resignation from key detainee policy post

Many of the "War on Terror" policies he spent years condemning were ones expressly embraced by Obama.
99

Palin, Prejean: Beastly treatment for beauties

The governor turned author must fight what the pageant queen learned: Politics and hotness make strange bedfellows

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon