GG:
Wow. There were a couple of other things I was planning on writing about tomorrow, but I'm positive I won't be able to resist that.
:-)
Alter:
That's because until now, few online publications have invested enough money to undertake original reporting, which is much more expensive than mouthing off at home.
Why do I have a strong feeling Alter put that lunch on his expense account?
But our batting averages--and David Broder's--are a helluva lot higher than the Jebidiah Reeds of the world
I doubt that; if a two-second Google search netted me this great example of Aker's wisdom, the Greenwalding tomorrow should be quite glorious:
Colin Powell was not convincing on al-Qaida/Iraq connections, but he was persuasive on Iraq's efforts to obtain nuclear weapons.
http://www.slate.com/id/2078766/
I really hope he watched Moyers' show, so he could glean a few tips from some experienced reporters.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox