This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, April 18, 2007 12:00 AM

Our benevolent surveillance state

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, April 18, 2007 09:40 AM

    Good points Nick

    These are the guys who use "Nanny state" as a term of derision, and yet this is exactly what they are proposing to create. Well, I guess there will be one major difference in how this is done, in the so-called conservative (neo-con) nanny state, the government will have control of all the information regarding any aspect of your life as you try to maintain a job and life in an increasingly hostile economic environment. In the liberal nanny state that the neo-cons hate so much, the nanny state would actually be proving health care for everyone, voting rights, civil rights, you know, useless stuff like that.

    How they went from being the "Black helicopter" fear mongers to the guys putting the fuel in these choppers is a truly stunning example of their ability to turn black into white as long as it serves their ideological underpinnings.

Most Active Letters Threads

685

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
592

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
316

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon