This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, April 9, 2007 12:00 AM

The unresolved story of ABC News' false Saddam-anthrax reports

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, April 9, 2007 08:58 AM

    Do journalists really out lying sources? Haven't seen it

    Glenn, you've written several times something similar to this quote from your article:

    There is a widely accepted journalistic principle that reporters are not required to conceal the identity of anonymous sources who feed them false information with the intent to induce the journalist to disseminate the falsehoods. In fact, in such a situation, there is an obligation on the part of the reporter to reveal who the sources are who passed on those lies.

    I see no evidence that such a principle actually exists and is followed. Sources lie to journalists, and journalists go back to the same sources, again and again.

Most Active Letters Threads

683

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
543

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
448

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
440

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
290

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon