Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
  • As seen from the "Not Pelosi's Democratoc Party" faction

    At least my view from it ...

    While finding the Post article and the Anglo-Dutch "Liberal" thug Cheney and his thugs contemptible, I can also include Feinstein, Boxer, and most surely their plant Hon. Speaker Pelosi in that category.

    Feinstein and Boxer, due to their known connections - through their husbands (?) - to the same interests as Cheney and the Anglo Dutch Liberal colonialists.

    Pelosi, due to her irrelevant insult of Jimmy Carter - that he does not speak for the Democratic Party - in response to the release of his latest book. Who said he would even suggest that he was speaking for "Her Majesty's" Democratic Party ? Why would Carter insult himself in such a way ?

    The intelligencia and the man on the street in ISrael agreed with Carter's assessment. Olmert (and as always Netanyau) seems to want to ignore this contempt for the Bush administration.

    But by ignoring the man on teh street and the intelligencia Pelosi casts her lot with Olmert - and apparently Cheney.

    Is this a wonderful - if transparent - game, or what ?

    It is in this regard - that Pelosi does not act on the interest of Americans (as agents of revolution against the Globalists) - that she can be shoe-horned into the same ugly category as Gingrich. She just brings feminine touch to the collection.