This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Friday, March 16, 2007 12:00 AM

The DOJ's explicit refusal to obey the law

Read other letters about this article

  • Friday, March 16, 2007 01:24 PM

    This DoJ letter

    ...is just incredible. It represents all the thinking (& confabulation & obfuscation) of this administration in regard to the TSP, state secrets, prosecution of the press...you name it. Here's something I didn't know (apologies if this came up in the Padilla/videotape post):

    Question 14. Recently, U.S. District Court Judge Marcia Cooke authorized Jose Padilla, a former enemy combatant, to review classified information, including memoranda and videotapes regarding his status and information obtained during his interrogations, for use in his defense in a separate Miami terrorism case. What prevented the Administration from invoking the State Secrets Privilege in this case?

    ANSWER: The Government may not invoke the state secrets privilege in criminal prosecutions. See, e.g., United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1, 12 (1953).

    So, when you can't invoke state secrets privilege, just lose it. Congress has a tough row to hoe.

Most Active Letters Threads

417

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
188

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
110

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
55

Police to talk to Woods

Early morning crash raises questions, and revives tabloid speculation

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon