Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
"Isn't it long overdue that someone tell Kurtz that he needs to try harder if he wants to maintain his pretense of nonpartisan, above-it-all, objective media observer?"
He's not trying very hard lately. When he did a puff piece on Malkin and noted that her home address had been outed, without bothering to note some fool did this in reaction to Malkin's practice of posting the home addresses of some poor kids who's politics she didn't like, he played fast and loose with his own ethics.
Kurtz only plays a media watchdog on television. In print he's not a watchdog, he's a two-bit attack dog. The man uses Malkin as his source to go after left-wing blog anger. That is confoundingly hypocritical.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox
