Site Presented By
Sunday, Nov 8, 2009
That is quite funny how you predicted he would write about this. This is actually pretty important.
One of the reasons (imo) for the rise of the Pro-Republican media was their ability to be unpredictable (especially against Democrats or any non-Republican in counter-point interviews). This put people on the defensive right away, rarely getting up. Even if their unpredictability hinged on them sinking lower (perhaps they have sunk as far as possible).
Either way, once they become overtly predictable (which they appear to be) they can be defeated. When they sound more insane/nonsensical/contradictory they can simply be defeated by their own arguments: so simply that it can be done in a 30 second interview. It's only a matter of time... hopefully not much time.
Much of the initial coverage about Fort Hood turned out to be wrong. Is there anything wrong with that?
The accountability imposed by another country for the CIA's kidnapping and torture reveals much about our own.
Fox News' morning show plays to type, talking about whether Muslims in the Army should face "special debriefings"
The survivor and author is upset about comparisons some on the right are making to genocide
Once seen as a lunatic fringe, reactionary anti-women groups are courting respectability
Salon headlines in your mailbox
