- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
Well, no...but I hardly think you can legitimately hold O'Reilly responsible for what they believe.
Look, I don't give a shit about holding people responsible for what they believe. What I care about is what consequences might arise from them believing it.
Look at Congress. Look at how many of them members score 80-100% ratings from the Christian Coalition. The Christian Coalition, let me tell you, isn't exactly in the business of promoting democracy.
And they know this. They know they have to cloak their intentions, make them sound more moderate than they are. Google Ralph Reed - see if you can find the quote where he talks "metaphorically" about sneaking up on political opponents stealithly, and them BANG! you're in a body bag.
O'Reilly's rhetoric is helping Ralph Reed sneak up on "us". Bill Donohue, you know, the guy who talks about the "secular jews" in Hollywood, is part of that Dominionist movement. When O'Reilly's guest tried to respond to O'Reilly - who had been saying Amanda Marcotte and Mellisa McEwan were "anti Christian bigots" - Donohue was an anti-Semite O'Reilly started yelling at, denied Donohue was anti-Semitic, and threatened to kick her off the program if she said anything else about it.
Like I said, I don't give a shit about holding him responsible for what he believes. Its about what his beliefs are doing.
Once, after a demonstration in Berkeley 40 years ago, I was thumbing a ride home down Telegraph Avenue. I had hair nearly to my waist, was wearing a beaded Lakota medaillion around my neck, etc. A short-haired guy in his early thirties picked me up. It was only after I got into the car that I noticed the riot gear in the back seat. He asked me, What was all that about anyway; what is it that you guys want? It wasn't a hostile question, it was genuine curiosity, probably the reason he stopped for me.
Should I have wanted to off him?
No, of course not. And I don't want to "off" anyone, and do not appreciate the implication.
