This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 12:00 AM

Debate over government-funded police protection heats up

Conservatives decry "socialized" law enforcement; Democrats are divided over "single-payer" police protection
By Michael Lind

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, June 29, 2009 07:39 PM

    You laugh...

    But I bet theres a lot more people who oppose "socilaized" police then we think! Talk radio and FOX News have brainwashed so many people into thinking that the government can't do anything (except the pentagon) they might acutally beleive it can't even keep us safe anymore. We keep letting the right control the debate in this country, and we may be looking at this very debate going on in real life!

    —fightthetheocracy! Read fightthetheocracy!'s other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
Glenn Greenwald Read article
688

Obama's exceedingly familiar justifications for escalation

The "new" approach to Afghanistan touted by White House officials seems quite old
Glenn Greenwald Read article
370

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
329

Yes, it's Obama's war now

An uninspiring speech sells a dubious policy, but progressives who feel betrayed have only themselves to blame
Joan Walsh Read article
326

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
Glenn Greenwald Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon