Letters posted here are associated with the following article:
The letters thread is now closed.
Thanks for the etymology. I'll certainly side with Webster over Wingnut any day of the week. A "family" is pretty much anything we say it is - it's been an extremely flexible concept since the dawn of time, considering that its basic purpose is to ensure survival and prosperity, however people want to set it up. "Family values" is a buzzword, pure and simple, and the sooner people realize that the better for families everywhere.
Regarding the statistics Wingnut cites, it would be just as easy to respond by quoting those stats that show that people in the "red states" have considerably higher percentages of rape, child abuse, divorce etc. than people in the "blue states." But none of this really tells us anything. As Disraeli said, "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."
"Hello again. This week the editors at Salon have asked me to address how it can be, as Joe V. said in his question and as many of you asked in your letters and comments on last week's column, that conservatives continue to believe America is a center-right country."
What editors at Salon?
Thought you could pull a fast one, eh?
...is forty percent a majority? By your own statistics, sixty percent of Americans call themselves something other than "conservative". By adding self-described "moderates" to the "liberal" category instead of the "conservative" one, we wind up with a 3-to-2 majority of liberals in America.
Salon, please stop this stupid column. It's not even satire or amusing. Salon used to be a good place to find interesting political discourse. This column demeans Salon. If you continue to support this column, people, myself in particular, will no longer support Salon.
Contrary to what Mr. Walken suggests, the movement to expand the reality of what a family can be to include many kinds of definitions is pro-family, res ipsa loquitur. Wanting to limit this reality is anti-family.
Americans identify themselves as "conservative" in slightly higher percentages than "liberal" when given those choices. However, when asked about what they believe in, they show themselves to be what could only be called liberal or progressive in much higher percentages than conservative.
This has been documented many times and your examples were cherry-picked misleading nonsense. I could cite all of the studies and will link one good source to my signature here, but it's really not necessary because your own words make it clear:
The country, you write, "is not "liberal" in the Barack Obama/Nancy Pelosi sense of the word" .
Yet Barack Obama just won the election by a landslide.
So how does this work? Either Obama is not as liberal as you claim, or the country is.
Either way, as usual, your premise is basically defeated by your own words in the first few paragraphs.
What this amounts to is that the voters like the word "conservative" slightly more than the word "liberal", which has been demonized for years by the right and the media. (Yes, "the liberal media" is the big giveaway, since you hear it constantly, that's basically proof that it's anything but. Unless you think that it's the liberal media itself that's constantly calling itself that) yet the same voters are center-left in general, taken as a whole, meaning that the extreme right is averaged in too.
We don't need your theories or mine to see this, just look at the results. The Republicans became a fringe far right minority and lost all but the most fractional support, down to 20% now, and the only people who don't see that are those of you still furiously spinning.
Keep it up, as a Democrat I could only ask for your party to keep listening to you on the far right forever, it's a godsend for us.
--just act like you have a constant boner for the troops
Arrggh! Thank you again RI--hey Wingnut, while you're addressing the rest of the questions here--well, half of them are simply asking "hey, why didn't you and don't you answer Joe V.'s question?"--could you also tell us why on earth conservatives or Republicans have so much love from the military? Bush attempted to reduce their hazard pay, and to reduce their medical care as well, while pretending "we all know the GOP is the party that stands for what y'all stand for." This, when Kerry served in Vietnam, but Cheney got deferments and Bush got into the air national guard, and barely showed up even for that.
How in the hell did you guys get away with that? Shouldn't Kerry be the party that stands for supporting the military, and shouldn't Being Against the Troops be thought of as a "center-right" value, since Bush championed reducing their hazard pay?
Judging by his past columns, I'm expecting him to answer your letter. It might go something like this:
Dear Wingnut,
After reading your column all these weeks, I now see that I have supported pure evil all my life, as a liberal. I realize I can never truly make up for all those flags I've burned and all those wars I haven't supported, but I still want to be on the side that isn't going to burn in Hell while yours watches us from above and laughs, which evangelists have told me will be the special and sweetest pleasure of the blessed. That's not for me! Please, tell me, how can I, too, become a conservative like yourself?
-- dust1969
First of all, thanks for all of the hate and anger last week. I found it all terribly interesting, really.
This week, Dust1969 wants to learn to become more like me, and other hard-working, family-oriented, values-centered conservatives. I'm flattered by the attention, and happy to answer.
First, give up the gay sex, at least until you become an evangelical preacher or a congressman, and then, keep it very quiet. If anyone finds out, marry a staffer.
If there is any footage of you burning your flags, deny that it exists anyway. Our base won't check up on you all that much, they'd rather just take your word for it.
A bowtie is preferable, but a modern necktie will work fine. Be sure to tighten it enough that it restricts at least 50% of the bloodflow to your head. This will help you to go with your gut. Remember, facts are for liberals, this is why they're boring and no one likes them. Bolos are strictly out unless you live in Texas.
Learn to speak without answering peoples' questions. This takes practice but it will become an invaluable skill if you become Press Secretary, or even a high-level campaign staffer. Study McClellan, Perino, and Dick Cheney. Bring up abortion as often as possible, this can't be stressed enough.
Pretend you never voted for Bush, because he's not a real conservative. In fact, you're pretty sure no one voted for him and it was just a glitch that he won twice, but it has nothing to do with the voting machines. It was probably somehow ACORN's fault. Remember that.
Sign up for the military if you want, but this isn't really all that necessary, just act like you have a constant broner for the troops. You can order posters of Bush in his flakjacket from my website.
I hope that helps.
(nah, on second thought, I guess that would be too honest for our wingnut. I'll work on it.)