Read other letters about this article
Why the anonymity?
I don't expect The Wingnut to provide an explanation, but the least Joan Walsh could do is explain why she believes anonymity for this supposed former public servant is in the best interest of Salon's readership.
Given the prevalence of unindicted war criminals in The Bush Administration and Congressional leaders on both sides of the aisle, extending anonymity to The Wingnut strikes me as reckless, thoughtless and utterly without merit.
What say you Joan?
Anything?
If this has already been addressed, I'd certainly like to read the explanation.
Because, frankly, this is fucking bullshit.