- Top Features:
- War Room
- Glenn Greenwald
- Broadsheet
- Joan Walsh
- Camille Paglia
- Since You Asked
- Follow Salon:
Read other letters about this article
An interesting article about some women's "emotional" feelings toward Clinton, far away from Appalachia:
http://tinyurl.com/4zof4n
I wouldn't call these women "sexist" (though some of them might be), or even representative. I don't think the article impeaches your point, either.
Rather, I think that it shows a)lots of emotional fault lines in this campaign (which the Republicans will use in the fall), b)there are differences among supporters that aren't captured by all the swapping of charges over 'racism' or 'sexism', and these differences are important, and c) we're in big trouble if we don't stop yelling at each other and start listening and reaching across the divides.
