Letters to the Editor
-
So this is what it's about -- denying another woman a spot on the ticket?
I've always suspected that, contrary to the complaints, the issue isn't that there are NO other qualified Democratic female presidential candidates out there, but rather too many for Hillary Clinton's taste.
With all due respect, I think Claire McCaskill, Janet Napalitano, Sarah Palin, Christine Gregoire and Kathleen Sebelius saw this too.
We all know Sebelius is on the short list to be Obama's VP, she's easily on everyone's Top 5 List.
Hillary knows what I know, if Sebelius (who is by far the most competent politician in this country and a governor who has ran something) is Obama's VP that gives Sebelius not Clinton the best chance to nab the 2016 Democratic nomination and the presidency.
Heard Sebelius on Air America again today. That woman's a president. Period.
Add Gregoire, Napalitano and Palin, who are all excellent governors and Claire McCaskell (who's quickly becoming a t.v. star as anyone who watches CNN, MSNBC or any other network knows) and it's clear you easily have anywhere from 5 to 7 women who have a better shot, and more actual experience, than Hillary.
As always this is about Hillary Clinton and nothing else. I agree let her run as long as she wants.
She can come to Kathleen Sebelius' inaguration in 2016.