Letters to the Editor
-
I'm impressed
The really impressive thing about this discussion is the unanimity of Clinton's supporters (assuming they're really Hillary supporters and not dittohead trolls...which is probably a charitable assumption). I found only two cases in which someone professed to agree with the article's position using something approaching reason. The remainder are just attacks on those dreadful Obamabots, who have been mostly contributing reasonably (if not lyrically) throughout. Seems like there is hardly a Clinton supporter who can actually defend their candidate's position.
Following is a summary of the Clinton supporter's positions and this question: Can any of you honestly argue that you believe this is a good policy?
MCE007 - satirical genius is surprised Obama is wrong.
Wondrouswoman - Obama is beholding to the oil industry, and a liar.
ElectroRobot - Obama supporters are "pussies" and beware the dictator.
LeCastor - lawyer up. At least there's a point to the post. But WTF on the STFU!?
jebldmm - accuses Obama supporters of not reading the article...and proceeds to make no comment ON THE ARTICLE.
sonofloud - ...Obama started it!
AKA Smith - Obamabots and double standards...
lolcait - "I'll take the one who panders openly"
skylerdexter - talk of downstream benefits...trying...but adds all Obamabots are elitist Prius drivers who eat arugula...
ShawnWM - Obama has "pisspoor judgement" and would rather see McCain in office.