Letters to the Editor

This letter is associated with the following article:
Hillary's missteps are legion, but both candidates are flesh and blood, and their squandered opportunities have prolonged the race.
  • If there were no superdelegates

    Obama would have won by now. He has enough delegates that Hillary can't catch up. However, Hillary hasn't lost because the superdelegates might come to her rescue and change the will of the voters. That's why the press says Hillary can't win w/o them and they don't say it about Obama. Without the superdelegates, this primary would be over.

    While I'm not happy about the superdelegates role, I have to ask, would it be any better to have, like the Republicans, crowned the nominee before half the States in the country have voted?