This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, April 7, 2008 12:00 AM

Why Hillary Clinton should be winning

Under a winner-take-all primary system, Hillary Clinton would have a wide lead over Barack Obama -- and enough delegates to clinch the nomination by June.
By Sean Wilentz

Read other letters about this article

  • Sunday, April 6, 2008 09:26 PM

    Heard it before.

    And only the big states count, or the battlegrounds, but not states Obama wins. Polls matter too, but only when they favor your candidate.

    We get it, life's unfair. Your candidate should have won.

    Well, she didn't. (But she might have if she'd taken the race a little more seriously - hope that doesn't keep you up at night.)

    —odanuki Read odanuki's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

484

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
Glenn Greenwald Read article
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
Alex Koppelman Read article
116

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
By Aaron Traister Read article
113

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers
Tracy Clark-Flory Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon