This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Thursday, January 10, 2008 12:00 AM

Why I'm still not for Hillary Clinton

Women voters rallied en masse for her -- but she has run as a stereotypical male and represents the same old cowardly Clintonian politics.
By Frances Kissling

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, January 9, 2008 08:04 PM

    You are quite wrong

    Hillary Clinton has arguably done as much for women as anyone else, and justly ranks as one of the foremost feminists of the 20th century. Her speech in China alone has been recognized as giving hope for better conditions to millions of women around the globe.

    Like John Edwards is a great feminist, after, by clear implication, trashing Hillary for (maybe) shedding a tear.

    Please.

    —jpetty Read jpetty's other letters

    Flag
Read other letters about this article

Most Active Letters Threads

495

The crazy, irrational beliefs of Muslims

Tom Friedman explains the real problem: stupid Muslims think the U.S. is about war and aggression.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
426

A key British official reminds us of the forgotten anthrax attack

A vast array of establishment and expert sources do not believe this episode was really resolved.
Glenn Greenwald Read article
242

The face of rotted Washington

Evan Bayh demands more debt-financed war - fought by others - while boasting that he's a stern "deficit hawk."
Glenn Greenwald Read article
210

Is Obama's civil liberties record understandable?

Was it unreasonable to expect him to adhere to his commitments regarding the Constitution?
Glenn Greenwald Read article
111

How dare you criticize wasteful defense spending!

So you think it's only terrorist-appeasing lefties who are down on Pentagon profligacy? Think again
By David Sirota Read article

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon