Letters to the Editor
-
Anonymouse
Please help me out. I'm having trouble grasping your point. This "allegedly" thing is moot. It was alleged lying until Libby was found guilty of it. Now he is a convicted criminal. A jury of his peers listened to evidence and determined that he did, in fact, lie and obstruct justice.
Even Bush has said that he wants to respect the findings of the jury. Is Bush lying about that? Does he, in reality, believe the trial was a total sham? If that's what he believes he should say so. If he does believe that, but denies it, then he is a political coward unwilling to voice his true convictions for fear of consequences.
I asked you in another thread: please explain to us why what Bush did is good for America and Americans. Why should Joe and Mary Average feel relieved and reassured that they do not, in fact, live in a country with a two-tiered justice system as it now seems? I'm sure we would all like to hear an actual opinion from you, not this tired and tiring repetition.
Please make your case.