Letters to the Editor
-
You're stupid
I "spew hatred" not because I believe what I'm saying but because it changes the nature of the arguement for you self absorbed morons. I do it all the time and you eat it up.
-
Enough already
David Sugarman is a pathetic old man let's just show him some "old man" courtesy and ignore him.
-
Unequal justice
Another female school teacher fooling around with her students results in her husband killing her lover. O.K. with me but what's wrong when a male teacher does the same thing?
-
It's not really sexism and misogyny.
Men throw vicious insults at each other all the time, usually in jest. That's just how the social dynamic works. A group of men will troll each other to find out which member of the group reacts the most dramatically, then they all gang up on that person just to see the over-the-top reactions. It's brutish, and I suspect its function is to drive outward emotional expression out of male peer groups. Regardless, it's simply how male social circles function. Women bloggers aren't experiencing sexism, they're not experiencing misogyny, they're experiencing what it's like to interact with males 'as a male' in a purely social context outside of the dating scene. These vicious men are merely treating women LIKE THEY TREAT OTHER MEN. The fact they use crude sexual epithets is merely from choosing the attack that gets the biggest response. They're not actually sexist, they're just trolling women like they would troll men, and using sexist remarks is a more effective technique at obtaining knee-jerk responses. The only reason women get attacked more frequently than men in this fashion is online is that the 'payoff' more likely. If these vulgar attacks were treated properly by women bloggers (that is to say, totally ignored for the useless spam that they are), then they wouldn't take place as frequently.
-
Posting writers addresses in comments section
Posting a writer's address in the comments section is inherently a threat, akin to brandishing a knife.
Even if the poster's intent is not to do violence to the writer, the poster's action would have no meaning without an implied threat of violence.
-
Nick, maybe the problem is that you write things like this on your blog:
"Fuck you and fuck valentine's day. Never had a loved one and never will. Women apparently hate me for some reason, despite that I have an endless parade of male suitors. So yeah, fuck you and fuck valentine's day. This is why, and when, I stopped drawing."
-
thanks Sam, really mean it
i've just been watching Ishmael Beah "A Long Way Gone: Memoirs of a Boy Soldier" on C-SPAN. now that's *real* problems. that kind of got me out of my feeling bad about myself. but knew i was wrong while i did it, and i did it anyway because i was mad. as i would expect of my children i was sorry and apologized. you forgave me. if you hadn't i would have had to just give it to God. ok, it *wasn't* impressing child soldiers but it was twisting her fears just to hurt. and of necessity it brought many others into that group. it was bad. i should have had more self control(but, i still hope it really upset her. what can i say? this guy's got a lot more lives before nirvana)
-
wilkinson, may i introduce you to Susan?
she too has but one thought - Get Off, Get Off, Get Off. you have something in common. you both think you can start a wave of obedience rippling though this forum.
-
unimpressed = zipit ? ? ?
bwa ha ha ha haaaaa
say what you will, un, but i most certainly *do* have a style, however much you excoriate it...
say what you will, unim, but i can assure you i'll match whatever metric of intelligence against, well, against your wetware, any day of the week...
(and just *what* does that prove ? you imply you are a smarter guy/gal/thing, and yet engage in NOTHING like a debate/argument... chicken or unable ? who knows, who cares... take another snark snipe and run away... *snicker*)
say what you will, unimpressario, but i actually refrained from nearly any/all 'dirty' words (*giggle*giggle) in my last post which ENUMERATED the various issues i have raised directly and tangentially...(oops, substitute 'indirectly', zip, i mean unimpressive...)
gee, so sorry the text of my comments ran to a couple of paragraphs; exhausting for you to parse that much language, ain't it, your little lips get *so* tired...
hee hee hee
ho ho ho
ha ha ha
ak ak ak
um, what else...
hmmm, what was it...
oh! i know: ONCE AGAIN zippy/unibambi fails to address ONE SALIENT subject i raised or argued about...
again, the important point was: if you don't realize that you MUST defend vile 'free speech' AS MUCH AS the 'pretty' free speech you cling to like linus to his blankie, then you don't give a FLYING FUCK about REAL free speech...
get stuffed, unimp, you don't give a shit about these issues...
art guerrilla
aka ann archy
here, dickhead, have fun (if you dare *snort*):
artguerrillaATTITUDEalltel.net
eof
-
yep, Sam, sure sounds like alizone
(from that url). but i was lucky. there's a yiddish saying, "the rocks in his head fit the holes in hers". that describes me and Bev. color is the *least* of our differences. she's the hard worker in the family. if the women on this list knew how *little* i did, they'd really gang up. but i did raise her kids as my own and i am really crazy about her. for the right woman a man only really has to provide love. real love.
-
thanks!
This is something I've been worrying about quite a bit, as a twentysomething, who spends quite a few hours every day on the Internet for work and pleasure.
I wish Joan Walsh, and I, and everyone else had better answers. Some day, I hope we will--till then, this article had the best statement of the problem I've seen in awhile: " I've grown a thicker skin. I didn't want skin this thick."
Thanks.
Matthew
-
Hi, dave!
So how come the little woman gets her name capitalized?
-
what really bothers me is
I wish we could write this off as a free republic rightwing problem. But we can't.
Unfortunately I've seen far too much abusive misogyny
on the left too, not infrequently from men who frequent salon. It's really scary.
One particularly vulgar poster of Salon Tabletalk , for example, who went by "Captain Billy", regularly assaulted the women posters as pigs, single fat slobs, prostitutes, ad nauseum.
When I complained about this a series of other male p;articipants, instead of backing me, backed him - even knowing that he was an abusive nut. The moderator did nothing. I quit my membership over it.
Misogyny truly seems to be the last acceptable form of biogry.
One which tragically has no boundaries either.
