This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Monday, August 28, 2006 12:00 AM

Squeezing out local produce

A stricter border means a shortage of farmworkers. Now in-demand organic veggies are rotting on the vine.

Read other letters about this article

  • Monday, August 28, 2006 05:48 AM

    I think letting the food be open to the free market would be better for all

    Countries have been acting wierd about their farm protectionism for years, and I still don't understand it. The United States subsidizes corn to a massive degree, making it incredibly cheap, and an easy filler ingredient to add to most foods, and whoa hey look, everyone's fat now.

    It should come as no surprise that "Organic" has become commodified and is now subject to the same price pressures as everything else in this world. Of course it has -- people have signalled they're willing to pay a lot more for something that costs a little more to make. It's an easy choice.

    I think a system of low trade barriers, no farm subsidies, and informed consumers (more on that in a minute) would be better for farmers, better for food eaters, and better for the environment. This margin is not large enough to contain the entirety of the argument for this.

    As to what's better for migrant workers... I can't say I care. I mean, yeah, I care about Mexico, and wish it well, but I don't consider it my explicit job to find something for unskilled Mexicans to do. I have noticed that Canada's "guest worker" program, where people come over, work at a farm picking tomatoes at a farm in Leamington for a few months, then go home, seems to work well to everyone's benefit.

    About informed consumers. This is related to the claim that the nutritional value of food has dropped precipitously since the earlier part of this century. Why would it have? It's the same reason that gas is cheap -- the externalities, of noise pollution, of ruin to our lungs, of un-human suburbs, aren't priced in. Ask yourself this: can you tell by looking at two tomatoes which one has greater nutritional value? I sure can't. Rationality means you buy the cheaper one. So fertilizer becomes optimized to punching out tomatoes year after year on the same land, and things that nobody is rewarded to care about (like enhancing the nutrient content of the tomato) are eliminated.

    I would love to get a way of learning the nutritional content of produce, and have it right up on the wall or the produce box alongside where it came from. I would also love to find a way to penalize farmers (all farmers in the world) for not using sustainable farming methods. All of this would be accomplished with trade agreements, and my dirty leftist little secret, is I hope they sort that shit out one of these decades.

    My personal soluiton to buy local; at least it's on the vine/tree longer. I'll trade an organic peach from California over an inorganic peach from Ontario any time.

Most Active Letters Threads

454

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
408

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
332

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
114

Is my kids making me not smart?

Stay-at-home fatherhood dulls my intellect to a nub. Excuse me while I ponder the subtext of "Hippos Go Berserk"
110

Trig, the anti-abortion straw baby

Sarah Palin's son is being used to demonize pro-choicers

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon