This letter is associated with the following article:
Letters
Wednesday, April 19, 2006 12:00 AM

Taking aim at the sleeping dragon

Imperial and imperious, the Bush administration's containment strategy for China may herald the next cold war.

Read other letters about this article

  • Wednesday, April 19, 2006 12:28 AM

    Agreed David

    Well David, I'm not at all in the "China Business," but I have to agree. Though they have no history of reaching far beyond their own borders, and probably won't start now, China has indeed been building itself up militarily and economically to be the regional hegemon in East Asia, and to supplant American influence there. I am certain that their military buildup has as its aim the eventual retaking of Taiwan, or at least the ability to threaten Japan, especially considering their recent disputes over the islands to the southwest of Japan (or southeast of China), with their natural gas deposits. So far, I find our response there to be firm, but not hysterical.

    As the Economist has reported, China has built up their military, and has conducted joint military maneuvers with Russia. They have bought submarines, whose primary purpose might well be to attack Taiwan, though they can have many uses for a country bordering or near Japan, Russia, Southeast Asia, and India. The Economist has made me laugh sometimes, first by musing that China haven't "yet" conducted joint maneuvers with the US or Japan (unless they were being sarcastic), and then by saying that China isn't likely to go to war with Taiwan, but that it would be nice if they told us why they were arming up. Gosh; I wonder why they could be buying submarines?

    They have, according to the Guardian of London, dropped handfuls of spies off in England and America, with every "diplomatic" visit; they have made concord with Iran, and with Russia, is one of Iran's main backers; as Condoleezza Rice was telling Canada to stop whining about the billions of dollars in softwood lumber tariffs we owed them (as we had reneged on our NAFTA agreement), China's Hu Jintao was visiting Vancouver, to lay the groundwork for a sea change in Canada's oil sands distribution, to the benefit of China; and China has fanned out across the South Pacific, in search of raw materials like timber, minerals, and energy sources, with which to fuel their expansion. Their influence in East Asia seems to be growing exponentially.

    The only thing that seems fatal in it all is the financial question. The Economist has (probably rightly) bemoaned the fact that, while we lambast China for pegging their currency at 8 Yuan to the Dollar, our balance-of-payments deficit is more likely caused by the fact that the Chinese save more than we do. I think that the currency peg (you will be able to confirm or refute this, probably) follows an economic and financial plan advanced by the very intelligent but ruthless Deng Xiaoping. However it has happened, though, one fact is clear: China sits on a huge, huge store of American dollars, in the many hundreds of billions. The first person I heard mention this fact was economic historian Niall Ferguson, in a speech a few years ago. I asked him, if this is the case, then can't we expect China to use this store of dollars as a weapon against us? He replied: yes. Not if, but when. I thought: well China won't pull out of the dollar all at once; they'll probably diversify subtly.

    Sure enough, China, since then, has diversified its portfolio, by pegging the Yuan to a basket of currencies, said to include (no-one knows for sure which currencies, nor the proportions) the Dollar, the Euro, the Yen, and the South Korean Won. I didn't hear much after the first report of it, a couple of years ago. This is China's weapon. What will happen if they sink the dollar? And can we not expect them to do just that, when they press the Taiwan issue? And have they not intended to do just that from the beginning, using our greatest strength (our economy) to make it into our greatest weakness?

    It is we who are reacting.

Most Active Letters Threads

740

The commendably missing element from Obama's speech

There was no pretense that human rights is our goal, or the likely outcome, in escalating the war
401

Do Obama officials know what his Afghanistan plan is?

What explains the completely contradictory statements from key aides on a central plank of the war strategy?
399

America's regression

It's almost impossible to find a nation with as many torture advocates as the U.S. has.
316

Palin: Birthers have "fair question" about Obama

Of Obama birth, the ex-governor says, "the public is still, rightfully, making it an issue" (Updated)
211

The poster boy for progressive self-delusion

Read Hayden's 2008 Obama endorsement to remember the way the left sold our centrist president to itself

View all »

Letters Help

Currently in Salon